The texture index introduced by Harris (1952) is reconsidered from the point of view of the orientation distribution of crystallites in a flat powder specimen. It is shown that the texture index can be used as an approximate measure of texture degree or as a texture correction factor in cases of a weak texture. Its failure in both these aspects for the strong textures is caused by an incorrect averaging of pole densities contained in the original definition of this quantity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valvoda et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: