Key result
Multimodality carotid plaque imaging using CT and MRI identifies vulnerable plaque characteristics that may better predict ischemic stroke risk than traditional ultrasound-based luminal stenosis.
Why the study?
Ischemic stroke risk may be more strongly driven by specific vulnerable plaque characteristics on CT and MRI than traditional ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing.
Does multimodality carotid plaque imaging (CT and MRI) improve ischemic stroke risk stratification compared to traditional ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing in individuals with carotid atherosclerotic plaque?
Does multimodality carotid plaque imaging (CT and MRI) improve ischemic stroke risk stratification compared to traditional ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing in individuals with carotid atherosclerotic plaque?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assessment of vulnerable carotid plaque characteristics using CT and MRI may offer superior ischemic stroke risk stratification compared to traditional ultrasound-based luminal stenosis measurement.
Contemporary imaging methods provide detailed visualization of carotid athero-sclerotic plaque, enabling a major evolution of in vivo carotid plaque imaging evaluation. The degree of luminal stenosis in the carotid artery bifurcation, as assessed by ultrasound, has historically served as the primary imaging feature for determining ischemic stroke risk and the potential need for surgery. However, stroke risk may be more strongly driven by the presence of specific characteristics of vulnerable plaque, as visualized on CT and MRI, than by traditional ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing. This review highlights six promising imaging-based plaque characteristics that harbor unique information regarding plaque vulnerability: maximum plaque thickness and volume, calcification, ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, lipid-rich necrotic core, and thin or ruptured fibrous cap. Increasing evidence supports the association of these plaque characteristics with risk of ischemic stroke, although these characteristics have varying suitability for clinical implementation. Key aspects of CT and MRI protocols for carotid plaque imaging are also considered. Practical next steps and hurdles are explored for implementing routine imaging assessment of these plaque characteristics in addition to, or even as replacement for, traditional assessment of the degree of vascular stenosis on ultrasound, in the identification of individuals at high risk of ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bos et al. (2021) conducted a review in Carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Multimodality carotid plaque imaging (CT and MRI) vs. Ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing was evaluated on Ischemic stroke risk. Multimodality carotid plaque imaging using CT and MRI identifies vulnerable plaque characteristics that may better predict ischemic stroke risk than traditional ultrasound-based luminal stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: