In this paper we re-examine the question of the excessive implied persistence of volatility estimates when GARCH-type models are used. We consider ten actively traded US stocks and we confirm the already established result in the literature that, when volume traded is inserted in the GARCH(1,1) or EGARCH(1,1) models for returns, the estimated persistence decreases. Since we feel that volume is affected also by within-the-day price movements and hence it is not weakly exogenous relative to returns, we suggest alternative proxies for trading activities. We assess that the difference between the opening price and the closing price of the previous day accounts also for most of the persistence in the autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallo et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: