Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most frequently diagnosed and prevalent form of leukaemia among adults in Western countries (Brenner et al., 2008; Kristinsson et al., 2009; Van den Broek et al., 2012). The gradual increase in life expectancy in Western countries over the past decades is one of the contributing factors that brought about the increasing incidence and prevalence of CLL, particularly among the elderly (Van den Broek et al., 2012). Also, diagnostic procedures have been refined, leading to increased detection of CLL at an earlier stage (Bennett et al., 1989). Besides, the therapeutic armamentarium of CLL has rapidly evolved with improvements in supportive care and risk-adapted therapy, and, more importantly, the advent of purine analogues, anti-CD20 agents, kinase inhibitors, and pro-apoptotic agents (Hallek, 2017). Despite the significant advances in diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of CLL over the past decades, it is mostly unknown how these advances have impacted the survival of patients with CLL at the population level, especially among contemporarily diagnosed patients. At present, large, representative population-based studies on this issue are scant and mostly do not encompass patients managed with first- and second-generation anti-CD20 agents, kinase inhibitors, and pro-apoptotic agents (Brenner et al., 2008; Kristinsson et al., 2009; Thygesen et al., 2009; Van den Broek et al., 2012). Therefore, the aim of this contemporary, nationwide, population-based study was to assess trends in short-term and long-term excess mortality among patients with CLL diagnosed during a 28-year period in the Netherlands. We selected all patients with CLL diagnosed between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2016 – with follow-up for survival until January 1, 2019 – from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology morphology code 9823. Details about the registry are provided in the Supporting Information (Data S1). Relative survival rates (RSRs) were calculated for four calendar periods of diagnosis (1989–1995, 1996–2002, 2003–2008 and 2009–2016) and four age categories at diagnosis (18–59, 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80 years) and measured from the time of diagnosis to death, emigration, or end of follow-up, whichever occurred first. Relative survival (RS) is the overall survival (OS) in the patient cohort divided by the expected OS of an equivalent group from the general population, matched to the patient group by age, sex, and period (Dickman & Adami, 2006). Multivariable evaluation of RS using Poisson regression was performed to assess linear trends in RS over time and the relative excess risk of mortality. A P < 0·05 indicated statistical significance. Further details about the statistical analyses are provided in Data S1. The Privacy Review Board of the NCR approved the use of anonymous data for this study. Baseline characteristics of 20 468 patients with CLL (median age, 69 years; range 21–101 years; 61% males) included in this study are presented in Table SI. The overall age-standardised incidence rate (ASR) of CLL gradually increased over time, but remained comparatively steady from 2003 onwards (Table SI and Figure S1). Throughout the entire study period, a consistent male predominance was observed (Table SI and Figure S1). The age-specific incidence rises sharply with older age (Figure S2). Patients across all age groups experienced ongoing excess mortality – as compared to the general population – in all calendar periods studied (Figure 1). Nevertheless, RSRs improved with each calendar period across all age groups. The multivariable model confirmed an improvement of RS across all age groups in the most recent calendar period (2009–2016) – as compared to the calendar period 2003–2008 – and showed a poor prognostic effect of male sex (up to age 80) and a previous malignancy before CLL diagnosis (Table 1). In this contemporary, nationwide, population-based study, we demonstrated that the overall ASR of CLL gradually increased until it remained comparatively steady from 2003 onwards. Similar trends were observed in Denmark and Sweden (Kristinsson et al., 2009; Thygesen et al., 2009). The initial increase can probably be explained by several factors. First, general practitioners and hospital-based physicians might nowadays be more diligent in requesting routine blood tests, potentially leading to the enhanced detection of early, asymptomatic CLL. Furthermore, the incidence of CLL might be overestimated, because most patients diagnosed with Rai stage 0 or I before 2008 can be reclassified into monoclonal B-cell leukaemia according to the most recent diagnostic criteria (Hallek et al., 2008). On the other hand, the incidence might be underestimated in these earlier calendar periods, because CLL is most frequently diagnosed by flow cytometry and most cancer registries primarily rely on pathology reports for case notification (Zent et al., 2001). Thus, although the NCR does not solely rely on pathology reports for case notification, the ascertainment of early, asymptomatic CLL might be underestimated in the NCR in earlier periods (i.e. between 1989 and 2003). A noteworthy finding of our study was that RS of CLL improved continuously over the calendar periods studied. This finding is congruent with results observed in the paucity of prior population-based studies from the United States (1980–2011), Germany (1997–2011), Denmark (1943–2003) and Sweden (1973–2003). Encouragingly enough, RSRs in the most recent calendar period of our study (2009–2016) surpassed those reported in the aforementioned studies (Brenner et al., 2008; Kristinsson et al., 2009; Thygesen et al., 2009; Pulte et al., 2016). Advances in supportive care (i.e. transfusions, growth factors, and antibiotics) and therapy are key factors that contributed to the improvement in RS over time. However, a normalised plateau in RS has not been reached, suggesting ongoing excess mortality for the overall patient population. Recent progress with kinase inhibitors (e.g. ibrutinib) and pro-apoptotic agents (e.g. venetoclax) might further reduce excess mortality in CLL. However, the benefit of these novel agents cannot be entirely objectivated in this study, since these modalities were not widely implemented for routine application in CLL in the Netherlands during the study period. The main strengths of our study include the use of a nationwide population-based cancer registry with comprehensive data available for individual patients. Limitations of our study include a lack of information on cytogenetic and molecular diagnostics and treatment throughout most of the registry. Therefore, it is not possible to correct for changes in the classification of CLL over time. In summary, in this large, contemporary, nationwide population-based study, RS improved significantly over time among patients with CLL across all age groups. The current study provides a benchmark for future research to evaluate the impact of a broader application of kinase inhibitors and anti-apoptotic agents on RS. The authors thank the registration clerks of the NCR for their dedicated data collection. The nationwide population-based NCR is maintained and hosted by the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL). The authors declare to have no potential conflicts of interest regarding the present work. AGD and LvdS designed the study; LvdS analysed the data; AGD supervised the data analyses; OV collected the data; LvdS wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors, who also interpreted the data, and read, commented on, and approved the final version of the manuscript. Figure S1. Age-specific incidence rates of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands according to age, 1989–2016. Incidence rates are presented per 100 000 person-years and shown according to the following sexes: (A) males and females together, (B) males alone, and (C) females alone. Figure S2. Age-specific incidence rates of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands per quinquennial years of age, 2003–2016. Incidence rates are presented per 100 000 person-years and shown according to sex. The period of 2003–2016 was chosen, as the incidence of CLL in the Netherlands remained comparatively steady as from 2003. Table SI. Patient characteristics. Data S1. Supplemental methods. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Straten et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: