Key result
CardioMEMS monitoring after transcatheter mitral or bicaval valve interventions detected significant decreases in mean pulmonary artery pressures (p<0.001) and increases in cardiac output.
Why the study?
Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation are increasingly treated interventionally, but the hemodynamic changes, additional value over echocardiography, and potential outcome effects of invasive CardioMEMS monitoring remain to be determined.
Does CardioMEMS monitoring provide valuable hemodynamic information in patients treated with transcatheter mitral- or tricuspid valve interventions?
Observational (n=36)
Does CardioMEMS monitoring provide valuable hemodynamic information in patients treated with transcatheter mitral- or tricuspid valve interventions?
p-value: p=<0.001
Invasive monitoring using CardioMEMS provides important hemodynamic information after transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve interventions, particularly when non-invasive parameters are unreliable.
May enable remote hemodynamic monitoring after valve intervention; leaves open whether this improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Mitral- and tricuspid regurgitation are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are increasingly treated interventionally. CardioMEMS is a transcutaneously implanted pressure sensor placed in the pulmonary artery that allows invasive measurement of pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output. METHODS: This proof-of-concept study aimed to observe hemodynamic changes as determined by CardioMEMS after transcatheter atrioventricular valve interventions, assess the additional value of CardioMEMS on top of echocardiography, and investigate a potential effect of CardioMEMS on outcome. Patients treated with transcatheter mitral- or tricuspid valve interventions (mitral: TMVR, tricuspid: TTVR) or bicaval valve implantation (bi-CAVI) were recruited. All patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included (4 with CardioMEMS, 32 controls). Patients with CardioMEMS were monitored prior to intervention and 3-12 months thereafter (one received TMVR, one bi-CAVI, one both TMVR and TTVR, and one isolated TTVR). CardioMEMS group: In both patients with TMVR and in the patient with bi-CAVI, mean pulmonary artery pressures decreased (all p < .001) and cardiac output increased significantly (both TMVR p < .001 and bi-CAVI p = .006) while functional parameters, echocardiography, and NT-proBNP were difficult to interpret, unreliable, or both. Changes after TTVR remained inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Invasive monitoring using CardioMEMS provides important information after mitral- and tricuspid valve interventions. Such data pave the way for a deeper understanding of the prerequisites for optimal patient selection and management for catheter-based interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dannenberg et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Mitral- and tricuspid regurgitation (n=36). CardioMEMS monitoring vs. Controls (no CardioMEMS) was evaluated on Hemodynamic changes (mean pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac output) (p=<0.001). CardioMEMS monitoring after transcatheter mitral or bicaval valve interventions detected significant decreases in mean pulmonary artery pressures (p<0.001) and increases in cardiac output.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: