Key result
A 1 SD increase in the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) score was associated with a significantly higher risk of death at 6 months (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.58-2.73; P≤0.001).
Why the study?
Given their advanced age and high comorbidity, individual risk assessment is crucial in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair.
Does the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) score predict 6-month mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous repair of mitral and tricuspid valves?
Observational (n=226)
No
Does the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) score predict 6-month mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous repair of mitral and tricuspid valves?
Hazard Ratio: 2.13 (95% CI 1.58–2.73)
p-value: p=≤0.001
A comprehensive geriatric assessment using the MPI score strongly predicts 6-month mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral or tricuspid valve repair, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
MPI may aid risk stratification before mitral/tricuspid repair; leaves open whether it improves decision-making or outcomes.
Background: Given their advanced age and high comorbidity, individual risk assessment is crucial in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair. Therefore, we evaluated the use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment score, the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), for risk stratification in these patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational single-center study, including 226 patients undergoing percutaneous repair for mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. The MPI was calculated preprocedural and covers 8 domains (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, mental status, nutrition, risk of pressure ulcers, comorbidity, medication, and marital/cohabitation status). We sought to identify an association of MPI score with procedural outcomes and 6-month mortality. Results: A total of 53.1% of patients were stratified as low risk according to MPI (MPI-1 group), 44.2% as medium risk (MPI-2 group), and 2.7% as high risk (MPI-3 group). Procedural efficacy and safety were similar between groups. The estimated survival rate at 6 months was 97±2% in MPI-1 group, 79±4% in MPI-2 group (hazard ratio, 6.90 [95% CI, 2.36–12.2]; P ≤0.001) and 50±20% in MPI-3 group (hazard ratio, 20.3 [95% CI, 4.51–91.3]; P <0.001). An increase in 1 SD of the MPI score (0.14 points, possible range of MPI score 0–1) was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.58–2.73; P ≤0.001) for death after 6 months. The risk association of the MPI with mortality remained significant in multivariate analysis including risk factors, such as peripheral artery disease and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels. Conclusions: A comprehensive geriatric assessment with the MPI score provides additional information on mortality risk beyond established cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Mitral or tricuspid regurgitation (n=226). Multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) score vs. Lower MPI score was evaluated on Death after 6 months (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.58-2.73, p=≤0.001). A 1 SD increase in the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) score was associated with a significantly higher risk of death at 6 months (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.58-2.73; P≤0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: