Key result
An international expert Delphi process involving 331 respondents from 78 countries identified a final basket of 32 procedures to standardize the assessment of global surgical capacity.
Why the study?
Comparability of indicators assessing surgical and anesthesia care access has been limited by a lack of definitional clarity and overly broad scope.
A 3-round Delphi process identified a basket of 32 surgical procedures to standardize the assessment of global surgical capacity.
May facilitate global surgical capacity benchmarking; leaves open real-world validation of the proposed basket.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define a globally applicable list of surgical procedures, or "basket," which could represent a health system's capacity to provide surgical care and standardize global surgical measurement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Six indicators have been proposed to assess access to safe, affordable, timely surgical and anesthesia care, with a focus on laparotomy, cesarean section, and treatment of open fracture. However, comparability, particularly for these procedures, has been limited by a lack of definitional clarity and their overly broad scope. METHODS: We conducted a 3 round international expert Delphi exercise between April and June 2019 using REDCap to identify a set of procedures representative of surgical capacity. To be included, procedures had to be important for treating common conditions, well-defined, and impactful (ie, well-recognized clinical or functional benefit). Procedures were eliminated or prioritized in each round, and those noted as "extremely" or "very important" by ≥50% of respondents in round 3 were included in the final "basket." RESULTS: Altogether 331 respondents from 78 countries participated in the Delphi process. A final basket of 32 procedures representing disease categories in trauma, cancer, congenital anomalies, maternal/reproductive health, aging, and infection were identified for inclusion to assess surgical capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This surgical basket facilitates a more standardized assessment of a country's surgical system. Further testing and refinement will likely be needed, but this basket can be used immediately to guide ongoing monitoring and evaluation of global surgery capacities to improve and strengthen surgery and anesthesia care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odland et al. (2020) studied Global surgical capacity assessment (n=331). Delphi exercise was evaluated on Identification of a final basket of procedures noted as extremely or very important by ≥50% of respondents. An international expert Delphi process involving 331 respondents from 78 countries identified a final basket of 32 procedures to standardize the assessment of global surgical capacity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: