Key result
In 690 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, oral treprostinil improved Week 12 risk scores, which mediated a reduced likelihood of subsequent clinical worsening.
Why the study?
Risk scores predict PAH outcomes in registries and may be therapy-responsive in trials, but their ability to predict clinical worsening and mediate treatment effects in controlled trials required further evaluation.
Do contemporary risk scores predict clinical worsening and respond to oral treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
RCT (n=690)
placebo-controlled
1:1
Yes
Do contemporary risk scores predict clinical worsening and respond to oral treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early improvements in contemporary risk scores predict subsequent clinical outcomes and reflect treatment response in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, supporting their use as surrogate endpoints.
BACKGROUND: Risk scores integrate clinical variables emphasizing symptoms, exercise capacity, and measures of cardiac strain to predict clinical outcome better than any single value in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Risk scores have demonstrated prognostic utility for outcomes in registries, and recent studies have suggested that they are also therapy-responsive in controlled trials. METHODS: FREEDOM-EV, a global, placebo-controlled, event-driven study, randomized 690 PAH participants 1:1 to oral treprostinil (TRE) or placebo. Clinical assessments were performed every 12 weeks to calculate the non-invasive French risk assessment (FRA), 4-strata COMPERA, REVEAL 2.0, and REVEAL Lite 2; median follow-up was 58 weeks. The Week 12 risk scores were used to predict time to clinical worsening (from Week 12) with Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. Log-rank test was used to calculate the statistical difference among risk categories, and mediation analysis tested the hypothesis that improvements in risk score contributed to reduced likelihood for clinical worsening. We assessed the previously proposed "net clinical benefit" (achievement of FRA low-risk status and absence of clinical worsening). RESULTS: Both REVEAL scores, COMPERA, and FRA at Week 12 predicted subsequent clinical worsening better than baseline risk. Mediation analysis demonstrated that Week 12 risk score reduction explained part of TRE's effect on clinical worsening, especially for those with higher baseline risk. TRE assigned participants were more likely to achieve the previously proposed "net clinical benefit" at Weeks 24 and beyond. Few participants who achieved 'net clinical benefit' had subsequent clinical worsening. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary risk scores were therapy responsive in FREEDOM-EV and early improvements predicted subsequent outcomes. This post hoc analysis suggests that risk scores may be a surrogate for clinical worsening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benza et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=690). oral treprostinil vs. placebo was evaluated on time to clinical worsening. In 690 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, oral treprostinil improved Week 12 risk scores, which mediated a reduced likelihood of subsequent clinical worsening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: