Key result
Nurse-led sedation is linked to ~1.5 fewer ICU days than anaesthesiologist-led sedation.
Why the study?
TAVI has become a high-volume procedure with increasing demands on hospital resources, prompting evaluation of a simplified, nurse-led sedation protocol compared to anaesthesiologist supervision.
Does nurse-led sedation reduce hospital resource utilization while maintaining safety compared to anaesthesiologist-led sedation in selected patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
Cohort (n=128)
No
Does nurse-led sedation reduce hospital resource utilization while maintaining safety compared to anaesthesiologist-led sedation in selected patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
Nurse-led sedation for transfemoral TAVI in selected patients is feasible, safe, and associated with reduced ICU stay and healthcare costs.
Nurse-led sedation was associated with shorter ICU stay in this TAVI cohort; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before wider adoption.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a high-volume procedure with increasing demands on hospital resources. Local anaesthesia with sedation supervised by an anaesthesiology team is the current standard of care. We aimed to describe our experience with a simplified, nurse-led sedation (NLS) protocol. This study enrolled 128 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with self-expandable Evolut R prosthesis between November 2019 and April 2021. Operators selected 50% of patients for NLS based on the clinical expectation of lower risk of procedural difficulties. Nurse-led sedation protocol demanded only mild to moderate levels of sedation. The clinical outcomes were determined from the local TAVI registry and the national mortality database. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the NLS (n = 64) and anaesthesiologist-led sedation (ALS) (n = 64) groups except higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (48.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.035) and peripheral vascular disease (20.3% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.036) in the ALS group. There was a trend for the larger prostheses used in the ALS group (P = 0.058). The procedural results did not differ, and coronary care team backup was rarely needed in the NLS group (6% of patients). The in-hospital outcomes were identical from both clinical and echocardiography perspectives, and 30-day mortality was low in both groups (1.5%). For the NLS group, preparation in the catheterization laboratory was quicker by 6.4 min (P = 0.01), and intensive care unit stay was shorter (2.03 vs. 3.48 days, P = 0.001). In conclusion, the NLS for the selected transfemoral TAVI population seems safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kočka et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI (n=128). Nurse-led sedation (NLS) vs. Anaesthesiologist-led sedation (ALS) was evaluated on Intensive care unit stay length (days) (p=0.001). Nurse-led sedation significantly reduced intensive care unit stay (2.03 vs. 3.48 days, p=0.001) and preparation time compared to anaesthesiologist-led sedation, with similar 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: