Key result
MAC linked to ~12-point reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications vs. GA in transfemoral TAVI.
Why the study?
Few studies have assessed postoperative pulmonary complications after TAVI according to the anesthesia method.
Does monitored anesthesia care reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVI?
Cohort (n=589)
No
Does monitored anesthesia care reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVI?
Using monitored anesthesia care instead of general anesthesia during trans-femoral TAVI is associated with a lower rate of postoperative pulmonary complications and shorter ICU stays.
MAC was associated with fewer pulmonary complications after transfemoral TAVI; extends low-certainty observational data but should not yet change practice.
Few studies to date have assessed the postoperative pulmonary complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the anesthesia method. The present study aims to compare the effects of general anesthesia (GA) or monitored anesthesia care (MAC) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. This retrospective cohort study included 578 patients who underwent TAVI through the trans-femoral approach between August 2011 and May 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, which were defined as the occurrence of one or more pulmonary complications, such as respiratory failure, respiratory infection, and radiologic findings, within 7 days after TAVI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative delirium, all-cause 30-day mortality rate, 30-day readmission rate, reoperation rate, vascular complications, permanent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, length of stay in the ICU, hospital stay, and incidence of stroke. Of the 589 patients, 171 underwent TAVI under general anesthesia (GA), and 418 under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the GA than in the MAC group (17.0% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001). Anesthetic method significantly affected the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, but not of delirium. ICU stay was significantly shorter in the MAC group, as were operation time, the volume of fluid administered during surgery, heparin dose, transfusion, and inotrope requirements. TAVI under MAC can increase the efficiency of medical resources, reducing the lengths of ICU stay and the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with TAVI under GA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis undergoing trans-femoral TAVI (n=589). Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) vs. General Anesthesia (GA) was evaluated on Postoperative pulmonary complications within 7 days after TAVI (p=<0.001). Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared to general anesthesia (5.3% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001) in patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: