Key result
A minimalist approach to TAVR using conscious sedation had similar 30-day mortality and safety outcomes compared to general anesthesia, but did not reduce procedural time or length of stay.
Why the study?
While a minimalist TAVR approach has shown safety and efficacy at civilian hospitals, limited data exist regarding developing this approach at Veterans Affairs medical centers.
Does a minimalist approach with conscious sedation and TTE improve outcomes or reduce length of stay compared to general anesthesia with TEE in veterans undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Cohort (n=258)
No
Does a minimalist approach with conscious sedation and TTE improve outcomes or reduce length of stay compared to general anesthesia with TEE in veterans undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
A minimalist approach to TAVR using conscious sedation and TTE is safe and effective in the veteran population but does not reduce length of stay compared to general anesthesia.
OBJECTIVES: While a minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) approach has shown safety and efficacy at civilian hospitals, limited data exist regarding developing this approach at Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (VAMCs). We implemented TAVR with minimalist approach (MA) using conscious sedation (CS) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and compared safety and outcomes with general anesthesia (GA) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at a university-affiliated VAMC. METHODS: A total of 258 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR at a VAMC between November 2013 and October 2019. Ninety-three patients underwent GA/TEE and 165 patients underwent CS/TTE with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. Propensity-score matching with nearest-neighbor matching was used to account for baseline differences, yielding 227 participants (81 GA, 146 CS). RESULTS: MA-TAVR had no effect on 30-day mortality or paravalvular leakage. No differences were found in permanent pacemaker implantation, major vascular complications, or postoperative hemodynamics. In this population, MA-TAVR did not reduce procedural time, hospital length of stay, or intensive care unit length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike civilian hospitals, MA with CS/TTE did not reduce overall length of stay in the veteran population; however, it was safe and effective for transfemoral TAVR without impacting clinical outcomes of mortality, major vascular complications, and paravalvular leakage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lum et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=258). Minimalist approach (conscious sedation with transthoracic echocardiography) vs. General anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography was evaluated on 30-day mortality, paravalvular leakage, and length of stay. A minimalist approach to TAVR using conscious sedation had similar 30-day mortality and safety outcomes compared to general anesthesia, but did not reduce procedural time or length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: