Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study explores how networking improves school turnaround in eastern and western China, indicating significant impacts.
While networking for school turnaround has been widely discussed, how networking benefits turnaround schools is underresearched, and research on complex networking approaches’ systematic effects on school turnaround is scarce. Referencing Shanghai and Chongqing, China, this qualitative study found six mechanisms through which networking improves turnaround schools: providing multilevel professional guidance, connecting policy requirements and school needs, propelling teachers’ self-directed improvement, widening teachers’ and students’ development opportunities, changing teachers’ thinking and practice, and enhancing schools’ popularity and reputation. Analyses suggest networking as an extrinsic–intrinsic-oriented facilitation instrument for school turnaround. Specifically, networking by receiving help facilitates turnaround mainly through extrinsic-oriented mechanisms that focus on drawing external investment and impetus; conversely, networking by giving help facilitates turnaround mainly through intrinsic-oriented mechanisms that focus on driving internal comprehension and effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan Tao (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: