Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Carbon dioxide hydrogenation has captured significant attention as a key reaction in CO 2 valorization. This reaction has proved valuable as it is considered as both a mitigating solution to harmful greenhouse gas emissions and a production method of high-value chemicals and fuels. Due to the thermal stability of CO 2, an intermediate C1 building block is required to initiate the formation of valuable C 2 + hydrocarbon products. As such, considerable previous research has sought to identify possible precursor-mediated pathways for the formation of C 2 + products, revealing two as the most prominent: (1) methanol-synthesis route, where methanol is the C1 precursor, and (2) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) route, which utilizes CO as the C1 precursor. For the FTS route, Fe and Co catalysts have proven to be the most promising. However, the wide range of products formed with such catalysts imposes a challenge on understanding the underlying mechanism of FTS, and thus selectivity control limitations. Here, we explore the active surface of an Fe–Co bimetallic catalyst under experimentally optimized reaction conditions using a theoretical approach. We model the catalyst in CO 2 hydrogenation conditions as Co doped χ-Fe 5 C 2 carbide. We show that the mechanism initiated by the C–O bond cleavage in CO 2 is preferred and we identify two main chain-lengthening schemes involving carbon coupling of: (1) CH x * species, and (2) active oxygen-containing species (HCO*). The energetic span approximation shows that both schemes are comparatively active for CO 2 –FTS under the experimental conditions, however, we establish that through the CH x * species coupling route, more undesired side reactions producing light products, such as methane and methanol, arise. In contrast, the active oxygen-containing intermediate route (via HCO*) shows a more direct pathway to desired C 2 + and C 5 + products (including higher alcohols) with minimal undesired side reactions.
Alhawaj et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: