Key result
Ultrasound-guided vascular access management during TAVR was associated with a reduced risk of the composite primary endpoint (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.86; p=0.02).
Why the study?
Vascular complications, major bleeding, or pericardial tamponade during TAVR may be influenced by procedural practice, prompting identification of clinical and procedural predictors of avoidable complications.
Do ultrasound-guided vascular access and rapid pacing via the left ventricle guidewire reduce procedural complications in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Comparison
Predictors including ultrasound-guided access and left ventricular guidewire pacing
Design
Retrospective analysis of a prospective registry
Follow-up
In-hospital
Authors
Loading...
May inform TAVR procedural optimization to reduce avoidable complications; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Observational (n=529)
Do ultrasound-guided vascular access and rapid pacing via the left ventricle guidewire reduce procedural complications in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Odds Ratio: 0.35 (95% CI 0.14–0.86)
p-value: p=0.02
The use of ultrasound-guided vascular access and rapid pacing via the left ventricular guidewire are associated with significant reductions in procedural complications during transfemoral TAVR.
Kotronias et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=529). Ultrasound-guided vascular access management vs. Without ultrasound guidance was evaluated on Hierarchic composite of in-hospital mortality, pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, major bleeding, and vascular access complications (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.86, p=0.02). Ultrasound-guided vascular access management during TAVR was associated with a reduced risk of the composite primary endpoint (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.86; p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: