Cohort study evaluates hyoscine butyl bromide combined with prostaglandins for enhanced labor progression in primigravidae, suggesting potential benefits.
BACKGROUND: Hyoscine butyl bromide (HBB) is a muscarinic receptor antagonist, which inhibits the parasympathetic (cholinergic) activity of the utero-cervical plexus. It has been used to augment the progress of labor. Although, it cannot initiate uterine contractions, in combination with prostaglandins, it may shorten the duration of induction of labor due to its antimuscarinic action on the cervix, if it is administered according to the recently published scientific evidence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of hyoscine butyl bromide used concomitantly with prostaglandins on the time taken to reach 5 cm cervical dilatation in primigravidae. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with 98 primigravidae receiving prostaglandins and HBB and 83 primigravidae receiving prostaglandins alone. HBB was administered using the hospital protocol based on the recently published scientific evidence (20 mg given as an infusion over 4 h) if there was no cervical change (dilatation and effacement) after 8 h of insertion of prostaglandin pessary. The time taken to reach 5 cm dilatation and the primary cesarean section rate were analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U Test & the Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: > 0.136). There were no statistically significant differences in the gestational ages or birthweights between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the Apgar scores, or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of 20 mg of hyoscine butyl bromide, diluted in 100 mL of normal saline administered intravenously over 4 h, based on the recently published scientific evidence, concomitantly with vaginal prostaglandins significantly shortened the time to reach 5 cm dilatation. In addition, it was associated with 8% statistically non-significant reduction in the rate of primary cesarean section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ridha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: