Systematic review compares the effects of type I interferons and monoclonal antibodies on ocular inflammation in experimental autoimmune uveitis, suggesting monoclonal antibodies may be more...
PURPOSE: Experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) is an animal model of non-infectious uveitis used to study immune-mediated ocular inflammation. Type I interferons and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent distinct immunomodulatory strategies used in autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis and associated uveitis. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of these treatments in EAU. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed for systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID-1320794). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through April 2025 for studies evaluating Type I interferons or monoclonal antibodies in EAU. Inclusion was rodent models of EAU treated with Type I interferons or mAbs and reporting clinical eye inflammation (EI) or histologic inflammation (H) scores pre/post treatment. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. RESULTS: = -1.76 [95% CI - 2.26, -1.27]), with time-stratified analysis demonstrating greater histologic improvement during later disease stages. Both therapies reduce EAU inflammation, but monoclonal antibodies demonstrate greater efficacy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that targeted cytokine or co-stimulatory pathway inhibition demonstrated larger anti-inflammatory effects than interferon-mediated immunomodulation in preclinical EAU models, though clinical applicability remains uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceniza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: