Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study develops a deep learning model to accurately assess muscle volume in individuals, indicating improved efficiency in body composition analysis.
To develop a deep learning-based automated trunk muscle volumetry method using whole-body CT from PET/CT and evaluate its performance against bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this retrospective study, an nnU-Net-based segmentation model was developed using a three-step iterative refinement strategy with 20 manually annotated datasets. Trunk muscles were segmented in 209 individuals (median age 52 years, IQR 47-60.3; 148 men) undergoing PET/CT and BIA. Model performance was validated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) compared BIA-derived trunk muscle mass with that estimated by automated 3D volume or conventional 2D L3 cross-sectional area (CSA). Williams' t test compared dependent correlations. The segmentation model achieved a DSC of 0.991. Automated 3D muscle volume demonstrated a significantly stronger correlation with BIA-derived mass (r = 0.961; 95% CI: 0.948, 0.970) compared to 2D L3-CSA (r = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.886, 0.933; P < 0.001). While 3D volumetry maintained high correlations in both sexes (r = 0.898 for both), 2D L3-CSA showed significantly reduced performance in men (r = 0.757; P < 0.001 vs. 3D). Automated 3D volumetry provides a significantly more robust assessment of muscle mass than conventional 2D metrics by capturing whole-trunk anatomical variations. This framework enables accurate, scalable body composition analysis directly from routine PET/CT workflows without additional radiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: