Evaluates an AI-assisted approach for evidence management in automotive SPICE assessments, suggesting improved efficiency and cognitive load reduction.
Automotive SPICE® (ASPICE) conformance activities require systematic discovery and evaluation of project documentation against standardised process indicators, consuming an estimated 40–60% of assessment preparation time with high extraneous cognitive load. This paper presents Smart Evidence Management (SEM), a principled Human–AI Collaboration (HAIC) approach grounded in Cognitive Load Theory, Trust in Automation, and Situation Awareness theory. SEM defines four design principles—AI-assisted discovery, expert-validated judgement, transparent reasoning, and full data sovereignty—as a novel generalisable HAIC pattern for documentary evidence evaluation in regulated professional domains. By reducing evidence-hunting effort, SEM operationalises the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) continuous improvement principle, enabling iterative conformance gap detection throughout development rather than only at formal assessment events. The Smart Evidence Manager, a prototype instantiation for ASPICE Process Assessment Model (PAM) v4.0, implements a two-stage hybrid symbolic–neural Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture with fully local Large Language Model (LLM) inference. An expert agreement study (n = 120 findings, five intacs® certified assessors) yielded a combined acceptance rate of 90.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [83.3%, 94.2%]). A beta-test study is under recruitment (target n ≥ 30 practitioners) to quantify cognitive augmentation effects, usability, and trust calibration. Cultural dimensions of trust calibration are discussed, extending SEM to intercultural deployment contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rüdiger Heimgärtner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: