Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates accuracy of a new 3D tomography method in complex geological areas, suggesting potential for improved modeling.
First-arrival slope tomography (FAST) is a velocity model-building method originally introduced for two-dimensional (2D) applications using ocean-bottom seismometer datasets. To enable more effective three-dimensional (3D) applications, we reformulate 2D FAST and propose an extended 3D first-arrival slope tomography (EFAST) method. Compared with its 2D counterpart, EFAST extends the data space by incorporating xline directional derivatives of the first-arrival traveltimes at both source and receiver positions, namely, slopes information in the xline direction. First-arrival traveltimes and their directional slopes in both the inline and xline directions are jointly incorporated to better constrain ray propagation in 3D media, thereby improving velocity model-building accuracy. For receiver- or source-dominant seismic acquisition geometries, the reciprocity principle is leveraged to define first-arrival observables, enabling efficient computation of the data variables and the objective-function gradient using a limited number of the forward and inverse problem equations. Consequently, EFAST maintains acceptable computational efficiency. Combined with a multi-stage smoothing strategy, EFAST progressively improves model-building accuracy and yields more reliable near-surface velocity models for critical exploration areas, such as foothill belt zones. Theoretical overthrust model experiment and field data application in a foothill belt zone further demonstrate the superior capability of EFAST in reconstructing multiscale subsurface geological structures. Therefore, EFAST provides an effective complement to contemporary first-arrival-based methods and should be promoted and applied in structurally complex environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: