Key result
Nurse-led TAVR pathway linked to a 3-day reduction in median hospital stay versus standard care.
Why the study?
Optimizing peri-procedural pathways for TAVR to improve efficiency while maintaining safety is a priority, but real-world data on nurse-led structured pathways remain limited.
Does a nurse-led structured pathway reduce length of stay and resource utilization in patients undergoing TAVR?
Observational (n=150)
Yes
Does a nurse-led structured pathway reduce length of stay and resource utilization in patients undergoing TAVR?
Implementing a nurse-led structured pathway for TAVR patients significantly improves workflow efficiency and reduces hospital length of stay without compromising safety.
Nurse-led TAVR pathways may shorten stays and cut resource use without safety loss; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Background With the expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), optimizing peri-procedural pathways to improve efficiency while maintaining safety is a clinical priority. Nurse-led structured pathways may standardize care and reduce resource utilization, but real-world data remain limited. Aims To evaluate the impact of a nurse-led structured pathway on workflow efficiency and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. Methods and results We conducted a multicenter observational study including consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at two high-volume Italian centers across predefined periods. Outcomes after implementation of a nurse-led structured pathway were compared with those from a preceding period. The pathway included standardized pre-procedural assessment, minimalist peri-procedural management, and protocol-driven recovery. The primary endpoint was length of stay. Secondary endpoints included intensive care utilization, procedural duration, use of invasive devices, time to mobilization, transfusion requirements, and in-hospital and mid-term safety outcomes. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 150 patients were included (75 per group). The nurse-led pathway was associated with shorter hospital stay (median 4 vs. 7 days; p<0.001), reduced cardiac intensive care unit length of stay (0 vs. 2 days; p<0.001), and higher discharge <72 hours (36% vs. 20%; p=0.029). Time to mobilization was shorter (24 vs. 48 hours; p<0.001), with less use of venous introducers (53% vs. 81%; p<0.001), bladder catheters (39% vs. 79%; p<0.001), and transfusions (3% vs. 25%; p<0.001). In-hospital and 6-month adverse events were low and similar. Conclusion A nurse-led structured pathway improves efficiency and resource utilization after TAVR without compromising safety, supporting its integration into contemporary practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D'amario et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=150). Nurse-led structured pathway vs. Preceding period was evaluated on length of stay (p=<0.001). A nurse-led structured pathway for patients undergoing TAVR significantly reduced median hospital length of stay compared to the preceding period (4 vs. 7 days; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: