Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows snow depth variations related to microtopography in the Retezat Mountains, indicating significant ecological implications.
Snow depth and persistence strongly influence ground–atmosphere energy exchange, meltwater input, and the thermal regime of rock glacier systems, yet high-resolution snow monitoring remains scarce in the Southern Carpathians. This study uses multi-temporal Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry to map snow-depth variability and microtopographic controls on the Galeșu Rock Glacier, Retezat Mountains. Eight UAV surveys were conducted between 2023 and 2025, including seven snow-covered acquisitions and one snow-free reference survey in August 2025. Snow depth was derived by DEM differencing and analyzed against morphometric indices, mainly profile curvature and relative topographic position. Results reveal strong spatial heterogeneity, with recurrent snow accumulation in furrowed, concave, and depressional sectors and reduced snow depth on local topographic highs. The 2024 surveys showed substantially deeper snow than 2025, with mean snow depths of 1.82 m in February and 1.62 m in March 2024, compared with 0.72 m and 0.83 m in February and March 2025. April 2023 displayed the deepest snowpack, with a mean snow depth of 2.27 m. Class-based analysis showed median contrasts of 2.30 m in 2024 and 1.20 m in 2025 between strong negative and strong positive curvature classes. These findings demonstrate that rock glacier microtopography exerts a first-order control on snow accumulation and persistence, providing a basis for future studies linking snow redistribution to ground thermal regimes, meltwater pathways, and ground-ice preservation in marginal periglacial environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ioniță et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: