Key result
Older age, lower education, and less wealth are linked to greater physical functioning impairment.
Why the study?
With population aging leading to an increase in functional limitations, this study analyzed sociodemographic factors associated with physical functioning impairment in elderly males and females.
Cross-Sectional (n=3,540)
p-value: p=<0.05
Older age, lower education, and lower wealth are strongly associated with physical functioning impairments in older adults, with additional factors like higher BMI and non-urban residence disproportionately affecting elderly females.
Background and aim: During the past few decades, the aging population has increased. With aging, there is an increase in functional limitations. The aim of this study was to analyze sociodemographic factors associated with physical functioning impairment in elderly males and females. Methods: This population-based modeling study based on a data from a third national study of health of Serbian inhabitants from 2013 in Serbia included 3540 elderly participants 65 years of age and above from Serbia. Physical functioning for both genders was categorized as follows: PF1—walking half a kilometer on level ground without the assistance of any mobility aids and PF2—walking up or down 12 steps. Modeling of physical functioning for both genders was categorized as follows: Model 1: inability to perform PF1, Model 2: some/a lot of difficulty in performing PF1, Model 3: inability to perform PF2, and Model 4: some/a lot of difficulty in performing PF2. Further variables were evaluated: age, education level, marital status, body mass index (BMI), wealth index, and place of residence. Logistic regression was performed to identify the variables that are factors associated with PF1 and PF2 in elderly males and females. Results: Statistically significant factors were as follows: age (Model 1 (male OR: 2.591; female OR: 4.708); Model 2 (male OR: 1.791; female OR: 2.354); Model 3 (male OR: 2.386; female OR: 4.985); Model 4 (male OR: 1.883; female OR: 2.772)); BMI (Model 2 (female OR: 1.348); Model 4 (female OR: 1.329)), marital status (Model 2 (female OR: 0.713); Model 4 (male OR: 0.688)); education level (Model 1 (male OR: 0.626; female OR: 0.537); Model 2 (male OR: 0.811; female OR: 0.653); Model 3 (male OR: 0.697; female OR: 0.494); Model 4 (male OR: 0.784; female OR: 0.639)); wealth index (Model 2 (male OR: 0.823; female OR: 0.740); Model 3 (male OR: 0.724); Model 4 (male OR: 0.787; female OR: 0.731)); and place of residence (Model 1 (female OR: 1.704); Model 3 (female OR: 1.575)). Conclusions: Increased age, being single, a lower education level, and a lower wealth index were factors associated with functional disability in the elderly of both genders, while an increased BMI and living in another place than a city were factors associated with functional disability in elderly females. Specific social strategies bearing in mind possible gender differences should be created and implemented in order to optimize the physical functioning, mobility, and participation of the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kostadinović et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Physical functioning impairment (n=3,540). Sociodemographic factors (including age, education, and wealth index) vs. Reference demographic categories was evaluated on Physical functioning impairment (inability or difficulty in walking half a kilometer or ascending/descending 12 steps) (p=<0.05). Increased age, lower education level, and a lower wealth index were significantly associated with physical functioning impairment in older adults of both genders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: