Key result
T2-GraSE mapping demonstrated a good correlation with directly measured myocardial water content (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.001) and was acquired three times faster than conventional T2-TSE mapping.
Why the study?
Does T2-GraSE mapping accurately and rapidly quantify myocardial edema compared to T2-TSE mapping and actual myocardial water content in a porcine model of ischemia/reperfusion?
Does T2-GraSE mapping accurately and rapidly quantify myocardial edema compared to T2-TSE mapping and actual myocardial water content in a porcine model of ischemia/reperfusion?
T2-GraSE mapping provides a fast and accurate alternative to conventional T2-TSE mapping for quantifying myocardial edema in vivo.
May enable faster CMR edema imaging; leaves open clinical validation before routine use.
BACKGROUND: Several T2-mapping sequences have been recently proposed to quantify myocardial edema by providing T2 relaxation time values. However, no T2-mapping sequence has ever been validated against actual myocardial water content for edema detection. In addition, these T2-mapping sequences are either time-consuming or require specialized software for data acquisition and/or post-processing, factors impeding their routine clinical use. Our objective was to obtain in vivo validation of a sequence for fast and accurate myocardial T2-mapping (T2 gradient-spin-echo [GraSE]) that can be easily integrated in routine protocols. METHODS: The study population comprised 25 pigs. Closed-chest 40 min ischemia/reperfusion was performed in 20 pigs. Pigs were sacrificed at 120 min (n = 5), 24 h (n = 5), 4 days (n = 5) and 7 days (n = 5) after reperfusion, and heart tissue extracted for quantification of myocardial water content. For the evaluation of T2 relaxation time, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans, including T2 turbo-spin-echo (T2-TSE, reference standard) mapping and T2-GraSE mapping, were performed at baseline and at every follow-up until sacrifice. Five additional pigs were sacrificed after baseline CMR study and served as controls. RESULTS: Acquisition of T2-GraSE mapping was significantly (3-fold) faster than conventional T2-TSE mapping. Myocardial T2 relaxation measurements performed by T2-TSE and T2-GraSE mapping demonstrated an almost perfect correlation (R(2) = 0.99) and agreement with no systematic error between techniques. The two T2-mapping sequences showed similarly good correlations with myocardial water content: R(2) = 0.75 and R(2) = 0.73 for T2-TSE and T2-GraSE mapping, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first in vivo validation of T2-mapping to assess myocardial edema. Given its shorter acquisition time and no requirement for specific software for data acquisition or post-processing, fast T2-GraSE mapping of the myocardium offers an attractive alternative to current CMR sequences for T2 quantification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández‐Jiménez et al. (2015) studied Myocardial edema following ischemia/reperfusion (n=25). T2-GraSE mapping vs. T2-TSE mapping was evaluated on Correlation with directly measured myocardial water content (R2 = 0.73, p=<0.001). T2-GraSE mapping demonstrated a good correlation with directly measured myocardial water content (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.001) and was acquired three times faster than conventional T2-TSE mapping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: