Key result
Functional overreaching induced by a 3-week overload training program in male triathletes was associated with a faster heart rate recovery (+8 ± 5 bpm) compared to baseline.
Why the study?
Does a 3-week overload training program inducing functional overreaching alter heart rate recovery in experienced male triathletes?
RCT (n=31)
Open-label
Randomly assigned to matched groups
No
Does a 3-week overload training program inducing functional overreaching alter heart rate recovery in experienced male triathletes?
Effect estimate: +8 ± 5 bpm
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs -1%
In endurance athletes, the development of functional overreaching is associated with a faster heart rate recovery, suggesting that faster HRR does not systematically indicate improved physical performance.
Should not yet guide overreaching monitoring in athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether heart rate recovery (HRR) may represent an effective marker of functional overreaching (f-OR) in endurance athletes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one experienced male triathletes were tested (10 control and 21 overload subjects) before (Pre), and immediately after an overload training period (Mid) and after a 2-week taper (Post). Physiological responses were assessed during an incremental cycling protocol to exhaustion, including heart rate, catecholamine release and blood lactate concentration. Ten participants from the overload group developed signs of f-OR at Mid (i.e. -2.1 ± 0.8% change in performance associated with concomitant high perceived fatigue). Additionally, only the f-OR group demonstrated a 99% chance of increase in HRR during the overload period (+8 ± 5 bpm, large effect size). Concomitantly, this group also revealed a >80% chance of decreasing blood lactate (-11 ± 14%, large), plasma norepinephrine (-12 ± 37%, small) and plasma epinephrine peak concentrations (-51 ± 22%, moderate). These blood measures returned to baseline levels at Post. HRR change was negatively correlated to changes in performance, peak HR and peak blood metabolites concentrations. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that i) a faster HRR is not systematically associated with improved physical performance, ii) changes in HRR should be interpreted in the context of the specific training phase, the athletes perceived level of fatigue and the performance response; and, iii) the faster HRR associated with f-OR may be induced by a decreased central command and by a lower chemoreflex activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aubry et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Functional overreaching in endurance athletes (n=31). Overload training program vs. Usual training (Control) was evaluated on Change in heart rate recovery (HRR) during the overload period (+8 ± 5 bpm). Functional overreaching induced by a 3-week overload training program in male triathletes was associated with a faster heart rate recovery (+8 ± 5 bpm) compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: