Key result
Among 1,802 patients who linked their Apple Watch to the EHR, only an estimated 0.25% would be candidates for new anticoagulation based on device-detected atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Real-world estimates were needed for the proportion of wearable device users who would likely benefit from anticoagulation if diagnosed with AFib based on wearable data.
What proportion of Apple Watch users with linked EHR data would be actionable for new anticoagulation based on passive atrial fibrillation detection?
Cohort (n=1,802)
No
What proportion of Apple Watch users with linked EHR data would be actionable for new anticoagulation based on passive atrial fibrillation detection?
Passive AFib detection via Apple Watch in a general EHR-linked cohort yields a very low proportion of patients (0.25%) who would actually be candidates for new anticoagulation, suggesting targeted screening based on EHR risk profiles may be more efficient.
OBJECTIVE: Utilizing integrated electronic health record (EHR) and consumer-grade wearable device data, we sought to provide real-world estimates for the proportion of wearers that would likely benefit from anticoagulation if an atrial fibrillation (AFib) diagnosis was made based on wearable device data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized EHR and Apple Watch data from an observational cohort of 1802 patients at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center who linked devices to the EHR between April 25, 2015 and November 16, 2018. Using these data, we estimated the number of high-risk patients who would be actionable for anticoagulation based on (1) medical history, (2) Apple Watch wear patterns, and (3) AFib risk, as determined by an existing validated model. RESULTS: Based on the characteristics of this cohort, a mean of 0.25% (n = 4.58, 95% CI, 2.0-8.0) of patients would be candidates for new anticoagulation based on AFib identified by their Apple Watch. Using EHR data alone, we find that only approximately 36% of the 1802 patients (n = 665.93, 95% CI, 626.0-706.0) would have anticoagulation recommended even after a new AFib diagnosis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there is limited benefit to detect and treat AFib with anticoagulation among this cohort, but that accessing clinical and demographic data from the EHR could help target devices to the patients with the highest potential for benefit. Future research may analyze this relationship at other sites and among other wearable users, including among those who have not linked devices to their EHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feldman et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,802). Apple Watch AFib detection was evaluated on Proportion of patients who would be candidates for new anticoagulation based on AFib identified by their Apple Watch. Among 1,802 patients who linked their Apple Watch to the EHR, only an estimated 0.25% would be candidates for new anticoagulation based on device-detected atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: