Key result
Smartphone and mobile vital sign monitors show potential, but lack adequate clinical validation and regulation.
Smartphone technologies have high potential for personal healthcare monitoring, but rigorous validation and regulatory frameworks are needed before widespread clinical adoption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians should not yet adopt smartphone vital sign tools; leaves open the need for rigorous validation trials and updated regulatory standards.
Smartphones, mobile applications ('apps'), social media, analytics, and the cloud are profoundly changing the practice of medicine and the way health decisions are made. With the constant progress of technology, the measurement of vital signals becomes easier, cheaper, and practically a standard approach in clinical practice. The interest in measuring vital signals goes beyond medical professionals to the general public, patients, informal caregivers, and healthy individuals, who frequently lack any formal medical training. On smartphone platforms such as iOS and Android, a proliferation of health or medical 'apps' acquire and analyse a variety of vital signs through embedded sensors, interconnected devices or peripherals utilising on occasion analytics and social media. Smartphone vendors compete with traditional medical device manufacturers in the grey area between health care, wellness, and fitness, as US and EU regulatory bodies are setting and revising rules for these new technologies. On the other hand, in the absence of robust validation results, clinicians are hesitant to trust measurements by apps or recommend specific apps to their patients, partly also due to lack of a cost reimbursement policy. This review focuses on the acquisition and analysis on smartphones of three important vital signs in the cardiovascular and respiratory field as well as in rehabilitation i.e. heart or pulse rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygenation. The potential, pitfalls, and perspectives on mobile devices and smartphone apps for health management by patients and healthy individuals are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruining et al. (2014) reported a review. Smartphone applications and connected devices was evaluated. Smartphone applications and connected medical devices show potential for monitoring vital signs, but clinical adoption is currently limited by insufficient validation and regulatory oversight.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: