PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 28, 2015Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry259 citationsOpen Access

Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

NKNyeonju KangJSJeffery J. SummersJCJames H. Cauraugh

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an attractive protocol for stroke motor recovery. The current systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of tDCS on motor learning post-stroke. Specifically, we determined long-term learning effects by examining motor improvements from baseline to at least 5 days after tDCS intervention and motor practise. 17 studies reported long-term retention testing (mean retention interval=43.8 days; SD=56.6 days) and qualified for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Assessing primary outcome measures for groups that received tDCS and motor practise versus sham control groups created 21 valid comparisons: (1) 16 clinical assessments and (2) 5 motor skill acquisition tests. A random effects model meta-analysis showed a significant overall effect size=0.59 (p<0.0001; low heterogeneity, T(2)=0.04; I(2)=22.75%; and high classic fail-safe N=240). 4 moderator variable analyses revealed beneficial effects of tDCS on long-term motor learning: (1) stimulation protocols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the contralesional hemisphere, or bilateral; (2) recovery stage: subacute or chronic stroke; (3) stimulation timing: tDCS before or during motor practise; and (4) task-specific training or conventional rehabilitation protocols. This robust meta-analysis identified novel long-term motor learning effects with tDCS and motor practise post-stroke.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6203be5a5e300a3289c838https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Introduction to Meta‐Analysis2021 · 9,811 citations
  2. 2Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update2014 · 5,833 citations
  3. 3A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes2004 · 345 citations
  4. 4Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.2015 · 8,340 citations
  5. 5Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke2004 · 1,482 citations