Key result
A risk scale using voluntary threshold apnea <34s, age >65, heart failure, and ASA class ≥III accurately predicted intraoperative critical incidents (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.95; p<0.0001).
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop a prediction model for critical incidents during extensive abdominal surgery based on the duration of voluntary threshold apnea.
Does a prediction model including voluntary threshold apnea duration predict intraoperative critical incidents in patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgery?
Observational (n=256)
Does a prediction model including voluntary threshold apnea duration predict intraoperative critical incidents in patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgery?
A novel risk assessment scale incorporating voluntary threshold apnea duration, age, ASA class, and heart failure symptoms accurately predicts intraoperative critical incidents during extensive abdominal surgery.
May aid preoperative stratification in abdominal surgery; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Трембач et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgeries (n=256). Developed risk assessment scale (voluntary threshold apnea, age, congestive heart failure, ASA class) vs. Other methods was evaluated on Intraoperative critical incidents (hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic) (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.95, p=<0.0001). A risk scale using voluntary threshold apnea <34s, age >65, heart failure, and ASA class ≥III accurately predicted intraoperative critical incidents (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.95; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: