PURPOSE: To assess the axial stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO)-inhibiting efficacy of a microincision hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) (Idea 613 XC) and a standard hydrophobic open-loop acrylic IOL (Acrysof SA60AT). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with bilateral cataract received a microincision cataract surgery (MICS) IOL in 1 eye and a small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) IOL in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed immediately after surgery and postoperatively at 1 week and 3 and 24 months. Posterior capsule opacification was assessed using retroillumination photography. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured using partial coherence laser interferometry, and IOL tilt and decentration were measured using a Purkinje meter. RESULTS: Seventy eyes (35 patients) were enrolled. The mean ACD at 3 months was 4.91 mm ± 0.26 (SD) in the MICS group and 4.60 ± 0.23 mm in the SICS group. The anterior IOL shift over the first 3 months was slightly smaller with the MICS IOL (81 μm) than with the SICS IOL (254 μm). The mean ACD was 0.377 ± 178 μm deeper with the MICS IOL (P<.01, paired t test). Two years postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher with the MICS IOL than with the SICS IOL (image analysis software score 2.6 versus 1.9; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: Two years after surgery, the PCO rate was slightly higher with the MICS IOL. The 2 IOLs had similar performance in terms of axial stability, decentration, and tilt. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gangwani et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: