Key result
Evaluation of low-risk TIA patients in a rapid-access clinic was feasible and safe, with a mean time to clinic of 2.5 days and a 2% rate of stroke-related admissions within 90 days.
Why the study?
In the United States, patients with TIAs are commonly hospitalized despite evidence that low-risk patients achieve improved outcomes at lower costs at specialized rapid-access TIA clinics, prompting implementation of an RATC to demonstrate feasibility and safety.
Does a rapid-access transient ischemic attack clinic (RATC) provide feasible and safe care for low-risk TIA patients?
Observational (n=99)
No
Does a rapid-access transient ischemic attack clinic (RATC) provide feasible and safe care for low-risk TIA patients?
Implementation of a rapid-access TIA clinic is feasible and safe, allowing timely evaluation of low-risk TIA patients without hospital admission.
Supports rapid-access TIA clinic feasibility for low-risk patients; leaves open whether outcomes improve versus usual care.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are commonly admitted to the hospital despite evidence that low-risk TIA patients achieve improved outcomes at lower costs at specialized rapid-access TIA clinics (RATCs). LOCAL PROBLEM: All patients experiencing TIAs at a hospital system in the Pacific Northwest were being admitted to the hospital. This project aimed to implement an RATC to relocate care for low-risk TIA patients, showing feasibility and safety. METHODS: Following implementation of the RATC, a retrospective chart review was performed. Outcomes included days to RATC; days to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); final diagnosis; stroke-related admissions and deaths within 90 days of the RATC visit. INTERVENTIONS: From 2016 to 2018, implementation of an RATC included patient triage tools; multidisciplinary collaboration between departments; a direct scheduling pathway; and emphasis on stroke prevention. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were evaluated in the RATC, 69% (69/99) were referred from the emergency department. Sixty-six percent of patients were seen in the TIA clinic in 2 days or less, 19% at 3 days, and 15% at 4 days or more. Mean days to TIA clinic was 2.5 days (SD 2.4). Mean days (SD) to MRI was 2.1 days (SD 2.3). Forty-eight percent (48/99) had a final diagnosis of probable TIA, followed by 32% (32/99) who had other diagnoses; 15% (15/99) migraine variant; 4% (4/99) with stroke. Two percent (2/99) of patients had a stroke-related admission within 90 days, another 2% (2/99) died of non-stroke-related causes within 90 days of the RATC visit. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of RATCs is feasible and safe. Nurse practitioners are integral in delivering this innovative, cost-effective model of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hermanson et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (n=99). Rapid-access TIA clinic (RATC) was evaluated on Stroke-related admissions within 90 days. Evaluation of low-risk TIA patients in a rapid-access clinic was feasible and safe, with a mean time to clinic of 2.5 days and a 2% rate of stroke-related admissions within 90 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: