Key result
A competitive field hockey match improved response times for a simple perception task at full-time (ES = -14 ms) and a complex executive function task at half-time, but decreased working memory at full-time.
Why the study?
Despite known positive effects of acute exercise on cognition, the cognitive effects of a competitive team sport match were unknown.
Does a competitive field hockey match alter cognitive function in field hockey players?
RCT (n=37)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
No
Does a competitive field hockey match alter cognitive function in field hockey players?
Mean Difference: -14
p-value: p=<0.01
A competitive field hockey match has domain-specific effects on cognition, improving perception and executive function response times while decreasing working memory.
Match play may enhance perception/executive function yet impair working memory in athletes; hypothesis-generating for targeted performance strategies.
Despite the known positive effects of acute exercise on cognition, the effects of a competitive team sport match are unknown. In a randomized crossover design, 20 female and 17 male field hockey players (19.7 ± 1.2 years) completed a battery of cognitive tests (Visual Search, Stroop, Corsi Blocks, and Rapid Visual Information Processing) prior to, at half-time, and immediately following a competitive match (or control trial of seated rest); with effect sizes (ES) presented as raw ES from mixed effect models. Blood samples were collected prior to and following the match and control trial, and analyzed for adrenaline, noradrenaline, brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), cathepsin B, and cortisol. The match improved response times for a simple perception task at full-time (ES = –14 ms; P < 0.01) and response times on the complex executive function task improved at half-time (ES = –44 ms; P < 0.01). Working memory declined at full-time on the match (ES = –0.6 blocks; P < 0.01). The change in working memory was negatively correlated with increases in cortisol ( r = –0.314, P = 0.01; medium), as was the change in simple perception response time and the change in noradrenaline concentration ( r = –0.284, P = 0.01; small to medium). This study is the first to highlight the effects a competitive hockey match can have on cognition. These findings have implications for performance optimization, as understanding the influence on specific cognitive domains across a match allows for the investigation into strategies to improve these aspects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malcolm et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Healthy field hockey players (n=37). Competitive field hockey match vs. Seated rest was evaluated on Simple perception task response time at full-time (ES -14 ms, p=<0.01). A competitive field hockey match improved response times for a simple perception task at full-time (ES = -14 ms) and a complex executive function task at half-time, but decreased working memory at full-time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: