Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hormonal receptors and markers for prognostic evaluation were detected immunohistochemically in 196 infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical detection of progesterone and oestrogen receptor is a method giving results generally concordant with those of the binding assay. However, immunohistochemical detection seems better. It allows the detection of hormonal receptors on small carcinomas, it is not modified by the endogenous hormones, and it has a slightly better correlation with prognosis and with the response to hormone therapy. Immunohistochemical detection of progesterone receptor has a prognostic value, sorting a negative subgroup with a poor prognosis from the oestrogen receptor positive tumours. These results can be obtained without quantitative immunohistological methods. ERD5, pS2, HSP27 and cathepsin D are associated with oestrogen receptor positivity. pS2 and HSP27 are interesting markers. They characterize a subgroup of oestrogen receptor negative tumours with a good prognosis. Moreover, pS2 is a marker of response to hormone therapy. ERD5 and cathepsin D do not appear to be of value as markers of prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hürlimann et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: