Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An experimental study of the diffraction and re-initiation of detonations in divergent channels in [Formula: see text] was reported in this paper. Both smooth and porous divergent walls were used in this study. Two re-initiation modes, termed re-initiation from expansion wave front and lower wall, were detected. Two kinds of transverse detonations were observed, one propagating toward the lower wall ([Formula: see text]) and the other toward the top wall ([Formula: see text]). For re-initiation from the expansion wave front, the re-initiation is due to [Formula: see text] and the influence of the wall condition can be ignored. For re-initiation from the lower wall, the re-initiation is mainly due to the Mach stem and [Formula: see text]. The reflection point distance for re-initiation from the lower wall is [Formula: see text] (smooth wall) or [Formula: see text] (porous wall) ([Formula: see text] is the detonation cell size). The delay initiation over a porous wall is ascribed to the diffraction of Mach stem detonation. Three collision modes of re-initiation from the lower wall were determined based on the collision between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], i.e., subcritical collision as [Formula: see text], critical collision as [Formula: see text], and supercritical collision as [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] is inlet channel width). The collision point distances are approximately [Formula: see text] for the smooth wall and [Formula: see text] for the porous wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: