Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) affects approximately 50% of pregnant women, causing significant disability. While body mass index (BMI) has been associated with PPGP, the role of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) as a measure of central adiposity remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the independent and joint effects of pre-pregnancy BMI and WHR on PPGP and cesarean section (CS) risk. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 401 women with singleton pregnancies who delivered at term (≥37 weeks) at a tertiary obstetric hospital in Tianjin, China, between January 2020 and December 2024. Pre-pregnancy anthropometric measurements including BMI and WHR were collected at the first antenatal visit (≤12 weeks). PPGP was assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, and predictive modeling were performed using R version 4.3.0. RESULTS: for trend <0.001). Compared to normal weight women, obese women had increased risk of PPGP (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.24, 95% CI 1.29-3.89) and CS (aOR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.36-4.10). Elevated WHR (≥0.85) was independently associated with PPGP (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.79) and CS (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.18-2.51). Women with both overweight/obese BMI and elevated WHR had the highest risk (PPGP: aOR = 2.56; CS: aOR = 2.68; P for interaction: 0.042 and 0.068, respectively). The combined BMI-WHR model demonstrated excellent predictive performance (AUC: 0.856 for PPGP, 0.842 for CS). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pregnancy obesity assessed by both BMI and WHR independently increases the risk of PPGP and CS, with synergistic effects when combined. WHR provides additional predictive value beyond BMI alone. Pre-pregnancy weight management targeting both general and central adiposity may help reduce these adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: