It is a mistake to regard micro-macro program as merely theme the smaller better. I have argued, following precedent of various micro-reductionists (Blumer, Homans, ethnomethodologists) that we ought to translate macro sociological phenomena as much as possible into micro realities of which they are composed. (Notice, however, that I say translation, not all-out reduction; for there are irreducible macro features in spatial, temporal, and numerical arrangements among microsituations: Collins, 1988: 394-5.) It is not an argument against micro-translation to propose counter-examples in physical sciences, for instance to point out that structure of biological organisms is no more real than molecular level of DNA. The aim of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randall Collins (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: