Key result
Video analysis reveals multidisciplinary EVAR teams operate largely in silos with limited interprofessional collaboration.
Why the study?
Hybrid operating rooms serve both open surgery and image-guided interventions, but work processes and staff collaboration during EVAR required investigation.
Observational (n=9)
No
Highlights a need to develop closer, more efficient interprofessional collaboration and reduce overlapping roles among different specialties working in complex hybrid operating rooms.
May indicate efficiency gains from closer interprofessional teamwork in hybrid ORs; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Introduction: A hybrid operating room (OR) is a surgical OR with integrated imaging equipment and the possibility to serve both open surgery and image-guided interventions. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the work processes and types of collaboration in a hybrid OR during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Methods: Data consisted of video recordings from nine procedures, with a total recording time of 48 hrs 39 mins. The procedures were divided into four episodes (Acts). A qualitative cross-case analysis was conducted, resulting in a typical case. The type of collaboration during specific tasks was discussed and determined based on Thylefors´ team typology. Results: An extensive amount of safety activities occurred in the preparation phase (Acts 1 and 2), involving a number of staff categories. After the skin incision (Act 3), the main activities were performed by fewer staff categories, while some persons had a standby position and there were persons who were not at all involved in the procedure. Discussion: The different specialist staff in the hybrid OR worked through different types of collaboration: multi-, inter- and transprofessional. The level of needed collaboration depended on the activity performed, but it was largely multiprofessional and took place largely in separate groups of specialties: anesthesiology, surgery and radiology. Waiting time and overlapping tasks indicate that the procedures could be more efficient and safe for the patient. Conclusion: This study highlights that the three expertise specialties were required for safe treatment in the hybrid OR, but the extent of interprofessional activities was limited. Our results provide a basis for the development of more effective procedures with closer and more efficient interprofessional collaboration and reduction of overlapping roles. Considerable waiting times, traffic flow and presence of people who were not involved in the patient care are areas of further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazzi et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) (n=9). Hybrid operating room work processes during EVAR was evaluated on Work processes and types of staff collaboration. Video observation of work processes during endovascular aortic repair revealed that staff from three distinct specialties largely worked in separate teams with limited interprofessional collaboration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: