Key result
Systemic lupus erythematosus is linked to ~3-fold higher risk of myocardial infarction.
Meta-Analysis
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To identify accurate occurrence and risk of cardiovascular (CV) events (stroke and myocardial infarction [MI]) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods: Systemic literature search in PubMed and additional manual search were performed to obtain interested studies until March 31, 2018. The pooled incidences and risk of stroke and MI were calculated.Results: A total of 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis. For MI, a total of 1,516 SLE patients were reported to had MI (n = 96,154) over a mean follow-up of 9.98 years: incidence 2.0% (95% CI: 1.7–2.4%), i.e. 0.20/100 pyrs; in the five studies, 360 SLE patients (n = 18,943) and 817 controls had MI (n = 111,525), revealing that the risk of MI in SLE population was 3.04 times higher than in the general population (RR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.81–5.11). For stroke, the incidence of 17 studies during the 10.09 follow-up period using random model was 4.4% (95% CI: 3.6–5.1%), i.e. 0.44/100 pyrs; in the 7 studies, 694 SLE patients (n = 22,594) and 4,034 controls had stroke (n = 255,023), indicating that the risk of MI in SLE population was 1.95 times higher than that in the general population (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.52–2.53).Conclusion: Based on the findings from previous reports, our meta-analysis showed that patients with SLE have been at higher risk of CV events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Systemic lupus erythematosus vs. General population was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (RR 3.04, 95% CI 1.81-5.11). Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have a significantly higher risk of myocardial infarction (RR 3.04; 95% CI 1.81-5.11) and stroke (RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.52-2.53) than the general population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: