Key result
Liver-directed genome editing shows promise in treating cardiovascular disease by targeting genes like PCSK9 and ANGPTL3, with early clinical trials demonstrating successful knockdown of target proteins.
Why the study?
This review was conducted to examine recent progress in somatic genome editing for cardiovascular disease, highlighting new gene editing approaches, delivery systems, and potential liver targets.
Liver-directed genome editing shows significant preclinical promise for lowering cholesterol and triglycerides, paving the way for potential cures for cardiovascular diseases.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines recent progress in somatic genome editing for cardiovascular disease. We briefly highlight new gene editing approaches, delivery systems, and potential targets in the liver. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, new editing and delivery systems have been applied successfully in model organisms to modify genes within hepatocytes. Disruption of several genes has been shown to dramatically lower plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels in mice as well as non-human primates. More precise modification of cardiovascular targets has also been achieved through homology-directed repair or base editing. Improved viral vectors and nanoparticle delivery systems are addressing important delivery challenges and helping to mitigate safety concerns. Liver-directed genome editing has the potential to cure both rare and common forms of cardiovascular disease. Exciting progress is already being made, including promising results from preclinical studies and the initiation of human gene therapy trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hurley et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Liver-directed genome editing was evaluated. Liver-directed genome editing shows promise in treating cardiovascular disease by targeting genes like PCSK9 and ANGPTL3, with early clinical trials demonstrating successful knockdown of target proteins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: