The electron self‐exchange rate of [Cu(L)(OH 2 )] 2+/1+ , k exp 11 (298.13 K) = 15 ± 11 m −1 s −1 {L = dimethyl 3,7‐dimethyl‐9oxo‐2,4‐bis(2‐pyridyl)‐3,7‐diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane‐1,5‐dicarboxylate}, was determined by a cross reaction. The analysis, based on classical Marcus theory, indicates that this relatively slow rate is to a large extent due to enthalpic terms (Δ G ‡,exp 11 = 62.8 ± 3.5 kJ·mol −1 , Δ H ‡,exp 11 = 36.0 ± 2.7 kJ·mol −1 and Δ S ‡,exp 11 = −92 ± 10 J·mol −1 K −1 ). The activation entropy is significant but not unusually large and the calculated outer‐sphere reorganization energy, Δ G *,calc out = 20.5 kJ·mol −1 , is at least of the same order of magnitude as the calculated inner‐sphere reorganisation energy Δ G *,calc in = 18.6 kJ·mol −1 , i.e. the deformation of the solvent sheath is a major reason for the slow electron transfer rate. This is believed to be due to the highly elastic coordination geometry which leads to little strain upon distortion enforced by the electron transfer but to comparably large structural changes and, hence, to a large outer‐sphere reorganisation term. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2004)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comba et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: