PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2011Canadian Journal of Animal Science140 citations

Residual feed intake adjusted for backfat thickness and feeding frequency is independent of fertility in beef heifers

View Full Paper
JBJ. A. BasarabMCM.G. ColazoDAD.J. Ambrose

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Basarab, J. A., Colazo, M. G., Ambrose, D. J., Novak, S., McCartney, D. and Baron, V. S. 2011. Residual feed intake adjusted for backfat thickness and feeding frequency is independent of fertility in beef heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 573–584. This study examined the effects of residual feed intake (RFI), RFI adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFI fat ) and RFI adjusted for off-test backfat thickness and feeding event frequency (RFI fat calving rate, 75.53 vs. 81.25%, P=0.34). No differences were observed between efficient and inefficient heifers in calving difficulty, average calving date, age at first calving, calf birth weight, calf pre-weaning ADG, calf weaning weight and heifer productivity. However, + RFI heifers exhibited a 1.9-fold higher calf death loss compared with − RFI heifers (11.11% vs. 5.71%, P=0.24). This difference was more pronounced in + RFI fat and + RFI fat & activity heifers, which exhibited 2.2-fold (11.84% vs. 5.33%, P=0.15) and 3.0-fold (12.66% vs. 4.17%, P=0.06) higher calf death loss compared with − RFI heifers. There was no relationship of RFI adjusted for backfat thickness and feeding activity on fertility traits indicating that backfat thickness and feeding activity may be associated with feed intake and should be considered when selecting heifers for improved feed efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Basarab et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a62bc92fe5b6bd6fe96c256https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2011-010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper