Panel analysis investigates CO2 emissions inequality linked to economic growth in OECD countries, suggesting implications for equity.
Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO 2 emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model’s distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: