DNA testing using a candidate-gene approach identified a possible disease-causing mutation in 31% of 2,298 families evaluated for inherited arrhythmia syndromes over 15 years.
Cohort (n=6,944)
What is the diagnostic yield of molecular and clinical testing for inherited arrhythmia syndromes in affected families?
Systematic DNA testing and cascade screening in families with suspected inherited arrhythmia syndromes yields a possible disease-causing mutation in 31% of families, identifying many presymptomatic subjects.
BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death is often caused by inherited arrhythmia syndromes, particularly if it occurs at a young age. In 1996, we started a cardiogenetics clinic aimed at diagnosing such syndromes and providing timely (often presymptomatic) treatment to families in which such syndromes or sudden cardiac death existed. We studied the yield of DNA testing for these syndromes using a candidate-gene approach over our 15 years of experience. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the yield of DNA testing. In subanalyses, we studied differences in the yield of DNA testing over time, between probands with isolated or familial cases and between probands with or without clear disease-specific clinical characteristics. In cases of sudden unexplained death (antemortem or postmortem analysis of the deceased not performed or providing no diagnosis), we analyzed the yield of cardiological investigations. Among 7021 individuals who were counseled, 6944 from 2298 different families (aged 41 ± 19 years; 49% male) were analyzed. In 702 families (31%), a possible disease-causing mutation was detected. Most mutations were found in families with long-QT syndrome (47%) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (46%). Cascade screening revealed 1539 mutation-positive subjects. The mutation detection rate decreased over time, in part because probands with a less severe phenotype were studied, and was significantly higher in familial than in isolated cases. We counseled 372 families after sudden unexplained death; in 29% of them (n=108), an inherited arrhythmia syndrome was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of disease-causing mutations found decreased over time, in part because probands with a less severe phenotype were studied. Systematic screening of families identified many (often presymptomatic) mutation-positive subjects.
Hofman et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Inherited arrhythmia syndromes (n=6,944). DNA testing and clinical cardiological investigations was evaluated on Detection of a possible disease-causing mutation. DNA testing using a candidate-gene approach identified a possible disease-causing mutation in 31% of 2,298 families evaluated for inherited arrhythmia syndromes over 15 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: