Accurate estimation of specific differential phase ( K DP ) is necessary for rain rate estimation, attenuation correction, and hydrometeor classification algorithms. There are numerous published methods to process polarimetric radar observations of propagation differential phase shift (Φ DP ) and estimate K DP , but the corresponding K DP estimate uncertainty is unquantified. This study provides guidance on how commonly used K DP estimation algorithms perform in various environments. We create numerous synthetic (“true”) K DP profiles, integrate over them to obtain “smoothed” Φ DP , and then add noise typical of S-band operational weather radar measurements. Each algorithm is applied to our noisy Φ DP profiles and compared to the true K DP profile such that the errors and uncertainty are quantified. The synthetic K DP profiles are Gaussian in shape, which allows systematic variations in their magnitude and width to determine how each algorithm performs in smooth, slowly changing K DP profiles, as well as steep profiles. Results demonstrate that algorithm performance is dependent on the Φ DP field received. These results are further supported by an error analysis of each algorithm for two more complicated synthetic K DP profiles. Some K DP algorithms allow users to change various tuning parameters; a subset of these tuning parameters is tested to provide guidance on how changing these parameters impacts algorithm performance. We then provide evidence that our known-truth framework provides insight into algorithm performance in observed data through two case studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reimel et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: