Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: North America has been experiencing an unprecedented public health-crisis from illicit/synthetic fentanyl/fentanyl-analogue (F/FA)-related overdose-deaths (DODs), with speculative warnings for a similar crisis to unfold in Europe. Aim: We summarize key Canada-based experiences relevant for reducing the adverse impacts of a (hypothetical) F/FA-crisis in Europe. Results: F/FA-availability in North America has risen in contexts of major oscillations in pharmaceutical opioid control and supply. Illicit F/FA-products are potent opioids for which correlates of (injection/non-injection) use-modes, adulteration (with other drugs) and use-contexts produce distinct risk environments for DOD. Standard treatment (e. g., OAT) and ‘harm-reduction’ (e. g., supervised-consumption, naloxone, drug-checking) interventions have been widely expanded; however, their overall scope and reach has been limited in curbing the F/FA-related DOD-toll. In response, ‘safer-opioid-supply’ (SOS) programs have been implemented to reduce exposure to illicit F/FA-drugs with promising initial signals for DOD-related outcomes, while requiring more evaluation and ramp-up for possible benefits. Conclusions: The likelihood of a possible F/FA-crisis in Europe is difficult to forecast; if unfolding, Canadian experiences suggest that standard interventions are essential, but likely would be insufficient for effectively containing the consequential DOD-toll; additional, evidence-based intervention strategies should pre-emptively be considered and developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: