Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy plays a crucial role in breast cancer management, restoring physical form and significantly impacting psychological well-being and quality of life. Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most performed technique worldwide due to its relative simplicity, shorter operative times, and avoidance of donor site morbidity. Achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes, however, remains challenging, as multiple factors—including patient characteristics, surgical technique, implant selection, timing of reconstruction, and adjuvant therapies—can influence the final appearance. Methods: Literature research was performed via PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library Database, focusing on studies examining aesthetic outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction published between 2015 and 2025. Data on type of study, sample size, aesthetic evaluation methods, and duration of follow-up were collected and summarized. Results: Among 747 articles identified, only 25 articles fulfilled inclusion criteria, including mostly retrospective studies, but also prospective studies, randomized clinical trials, and reviews. Factors such as BMI, inframammary fold management, and implant selection were consistently reported to influence aesthetic outcomes. Surgical techniques including ADM use, axillary advancement sutures, hybrid reconstruction with fat grafting, and prepectoral implant placement were associated with improved patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction often differs from surgeon-assessed outcomes, emphasizing the importance of subjective evaluation. Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity and retrospective nature of many studies, evidence indicates that optimizing aesthetic outcomes in IBBR relies on careful patient selection, tailored surgical planning, and meticulous use of evidence-based techniques, including implant selection, flap-based support, and adjunctive strategies. Patient-reported outcomes are essential for evaluating success, and future research should focus on standardized outcome measures and prospective studies to further refine reconstructive approaches and maximize both cosmetic satisfaction and quality of life.
Bertulla et al. (Thu,) studied this question.