Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis examines sedentary behavior in adults with hearing loss in Chile, indicating a need for integrated care strategies.
BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is common in midlife and older adults and may constrain communication and participation, potentially shaping physical activity and sedentary time; however, population-based evidence remains inconsistent. METHODS: We analyzed a nationally representative sample of Chilean adults aged ≥40 years from the 2016-2017 Chile National Health Survey (n = 3512). Hearing loss was defined by a "no" response to any of three self-report items. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire outcomes included overall physical activity (high/moderate/low), domain-specific energy expenditure (work, transport, leisure; MET-hours/week), and high sedentary behavior (≥8 h/day). We fitted survey-weighted ordinal, gamma (log link), and logistic regression models; effect modification by sex, age, and sleep quality was tested. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability-of-exposure weighting with gradient-boosted propensity scores. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of hearing loss was 27.9%. Hearing loss was not associated with overall physical activity level (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.90-1.39) or with domain-specific energy expenditure at work (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75-1.08), transport (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83-1.25), or leisure (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.42). In contrast, hearing loss was associated with high sedentary behavior (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82), with similar estimates after weighting (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.18-2.94). Subgroup analyses showed no consistent heterogeneity by sex, age, or sleep quality. CONCLUSION: In Chilean adults aged ≥40 years, self-reported hearing loss was associated with prolonged sedentary time but not with overall or domain-specific physical activity. These findings support integrating hearing care with strategies to reduce sedentary behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morales et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: