Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO 3 RR) to ammonia offers a sustainable route for nitrate remediation and nitrogen resource recovery. However, its implementation in real wastewater remains challenging, with limited strategies to address interference from coexisting ions. Here, we identify Mg 2+ as a representative precipitation-prone impurity and demonstrate that pulsed electrolysis effectively alleviated its inhibitory effects. Under optimized pulsed conditions, the nitrate removal and ammonia yield rate reached 98.0% and 3544.7 μg h –1 cm –2, respectively, restoring the lost performance under static operation with Mg 2+ (85.3% and 2821.5 μg h –1 cm –2 ) and matching the Mg 2+ -free baseline (96.1% and 3449.0 μg h –1 cm –2 ). Mechanistic studies revealed three key functions of pulsing: (i) suppression of local pH elevation, which limits Mg 2+ precipitation and particle growth on the catalyst surface; (ii) dynamic modulation of interfacial ion distributions, reducing Mg 2+ accumulation via electric-field-induced repulsion; and (iii) K + enrichment at the interface, which increases the energy barrier (1.15 eV) for Mg 2+ adsorption and enhances NO 3 – conversion. The pulsed strategy also effectively mitigated cationic interference in complex multi-ion wastewater analogs, demonstrating its broad applicability. Our findings uncover the mechanistic basis of pulsed electrolysis-induced ion redistribution in complex water matrices, establishing a generalizable framework to enhance the eNO 3 RR and other electrocatalytic water treatment processes under realistic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: