Why the study?
The study aimed to set standards for structured reporting of DXA measurements in adults within the context of fracture and fall risk assessment.
This consensus statement provides 28 standardized items and 19 clinical standards for structured reporting of DXA scans to optimize osteoporosis management.
Enables standardized DXA reporting to improve osteoporosis care; extends international guidelines with Pan Arab expert consensus.
Background Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an important diagnostic test for bone mass status. The aim of this work was to set the standards for structured reporting of DXA measurements in adults within the context of fracture and fall risk assessment. Results Two rounds of Delphi were completed. The first Delphi round had a 68% response rate, while round two had a 100% response rate. After round 2, a total of 28 items were obtained, which were classified into three domains. The percentage of people who agreed with the recommendations (ranks 9–7) ranged from 76.5 to 100%. The wording of all 19 clinical standards determined by the scientific committee was agreed upon (i.e., 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed). Conclusion The DXA scan report is an independent document that contains sufficient information to enable optimal osteoporosis management advised by an experienced healthcare professional. Setting up quality standards for DXA scans not only supports healthcare professionals reporting/interpreting bone densitometry but also meets the parameters outlined in national as well as international guidelines or recommendations for the optimal management of osteoporosis and subsequent prevention of low trauma fractures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miedany et al. (2023) studied Osteoporosis (DXA scan reporting) (n=17). Delphi consensus process for DXA reporting standards was evaluated on Agreement on clinical standards for DXA reporting. A two-round Delphi consensus process established 28 items for structured DXA reporting, achieving 76.5% to 100% agreement among the expert panel on all 19 clinical standards.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: