Key result
Right ventricular ejection fraction on exercise increased similarly in patients with normal coronary arteries (45.8%) and normal volunteers (46.1%), with no significant difference between groups.
Why the study?
Does right ventricular function on exercise differ between normal volunteers and patients with normal coronary arteries?
Observational (n=34)
Does right ventricular function on exercise differ between normal volunteers and patients with normal coronary arteries?
Changes in right ventricular ejection fraction during exercise are similar between normal volunteers and patients with normal coronary arteries, indicating that exercise-induced decreases in RVEF can occur independent of ischemia.
Large interindividual RV ejection fraction variability on exercise warrants interpretive caution; leaves open standardized reference ranges for clinical use.
Factors other than ischemia may alter right ventricular function both at rest and on exercise. Normal volunteers differ from cardiac patients with normal coronary arteries with regard to their left ventricular response to exercise. This study examined changes in right ventricular function on exercise in 21 normal volunteers and 13 patients with normal coronary arteries, using first-pass radionuclide angiography. There were large ranges of right ventricular ejection fraction in the two groups, both at rest and on exercise. Resting right ventricular ejection fraction was 40.2 +/- 10.6% (mean +/- SD) in the volunteers and 38.6 +/- 9.7% in the patients, p = not significant, and on exercise rose significantly in both groups to 46.1 +/- 9.9% and 45.8 +/- 9.7%, respectively. The difference between the groups was not significant. In both groups some subjects with high resting values showed large decreases in ejection fraction on exercise, and there were significant negative correlations between resting ejection fraction and the change on exercise, r = -0.59 (p less than 0.01) in volunteers, and r = -0.66 (p less than 0.05) in patients. Older volunteers tended to have lower rest and exercise ejection fractions, but there was no difference between normotensive and hypertensive patients in their rest or exercise values. In conclusion, changes in right ventricular function on exercise are similar in normal volunteers and in patients with normal coronary arteries. Some subjects show decreases in right ventricular ejection fraction on exercise which do not appear to be related to ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caplin et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Normal coronary arteries (n=34). Cardiac patients with normal coronary arteries vs. Normal volunteers was evaluated on Right ventricular ejection fraction on exercise (p=not significant). Right ventricular ejection fraction on exercise increased similarly in patients with normal coronary arteries (45.8%) and normal volunteers (46.1%), with no significant difference between groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: