Key result
Matched-pairs design emerges as the optimal method for evaluating life support in acute fatal illness.
Clinical research to evaluate the effectiveness of life support systems in acute fatal illness has unique problems of logistics, ethics, and consent. There have been 10 prospective comparative trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute fatal respiratory failure, utilizing different study designs. The trial designs were prospective controlled randomized, prospective adaptive randomized, sequential, and matched pairs. The trials were reviewed with regard to logistics, ethics, consent, statistical methods, economics, and impact. The matched pairs method is the best study design for evaluation of life support systems in acute fatal illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert H. Bartlett (2014) conducted a review in Acute fatal respiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was evaluated. The matched pairs method was determined to be the best study design for evaluating life support systems in acute fatal illness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: